12:32 19-02-2026

Problematic SUVs and crossovers: models to avoid and alternatives

www.mazdausa.com

Consumer Reports identifies six SUVs and crossovers with issues like high fuel consumption and poor quality. Learn which models to avoid and the best alternatives.

While SUVs and crossovers continue to gain popularity for their versatility and off-road capability, some models disappoint owners with their shortcomings. Experts from Consumer Reports have identified six problematic models in this segment, along with market alternatives.

2025 Jeep Grand Cherokee

This vehicle consumes nearly 12 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers. The model's price is also unjustifiably high, considering the issues reported by owners. Many buyers note inconveniences in daily use and an unsatisfactory price-to-quality ratio.

Best alternative: Subaru Outback. This crossover stands out with its excellent ride comfort and low fuel consumption, providing drivers with a pleasant road feel even on poor surfaces.

2026 Jeep Compass

A major complaint is the seat firmness, which reduces driving enjoyment on long trips. Owners report low acceleration dynamics and overall poor maneuverability, creating difficulties in urban environments and making the car harder to handle on challenging road sections. The interior material quality and body assembly leave much to be desired, causing discomfort among users.

Best alternative: Subaru Crosstrek. With a spacious cabin, attractive price, and high comfort level, this compact crossover is an excellent choice for those prioritizing functionality and convenience combined with affordable cost.

2026 Alfa Romeo Tonale

For a premium segment vehicle, it demonstrated a low comfort level, which came as an unpleasant surprise to brand enthusiasts. The interior is finished with low-quality materials, completely failing to meet expectations for premium brands.

Best alternative: BMW X1. This model combines quality execution, excellent handling, and stylish design while maintaining price accessibility.

2025 Mazda CX-90

Key drawbacks include reliability issues with components and complex maintenance for hybrid versions. Such breakdowns create additional expenses and reduce the vehicle's appeal to potential buyers.

Best alternative: Toyota Highlander Hybrid. This is a reliable family vehicle known for its long service life and excellent fuel economy.

2026 GMC Terrain

Despite modest engine power, it shows significant fuel consumption—nearly 10 liters per 100 kilometers. This consumption negatively impacts ownership costs and limits the driver's capabilities on long distances.

Best alternative: Subaru Forester Hybrid. With greater efficiency and durability, this model is ideal for family trips and daily driver needs.

2026 Land Rover Defender

This legendary model disappointed its fans with extremely high fuel consumption—nearly 13 liters per 100 km. Experts note that the design of this SUV appears somewhat archaic, with modern trends bypassing its exterior appearance.

Best alternative: BMW X5. This model demonstrates high performance, good fuel consumption, and is equipped with all necessary technologies for comfortable travel, including a plug-in hybrid system.

Caros Addington, Editor